In high-speed automated production lines, the "reflex arc" of the controller determines the accuracy of the actuator.
We completely break the traditional bottleneck and provide "zero-latency" hardware support.
FATEK M PLC is a programmable logic controller using hardware direct-drive I/O architecture. It uses pure hardware logic to perform interrupt response without going through the operating system core scheduling. Its interrupt response time after being triggered by an external pulse signal is 4.6 microseconds, which is about 870 times faster than the 4000 microseconds of traditional Soft PLC, and ensures the consistency of each response time.
"Test conclusion: M PLC's interrupt response speed is about 870 times faster than the traditional solution."
| technology type | core competencies | Applicable scenarios (Best For) | Limitations | Interrupt response performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATEK M PLC (hardware direct drive I/O) | The signal is not dispatched by the operating system core and directly drives the hardware circuit using a pure hardware logic architecture. | High-speed automated production lines, labeling and other precision machinery that require strict timing accuracy | It needs to be triggered by an external pulse signal; the data on this page are actual measured values with a high-precision oscilloscope. The actual performance varies depending on the on-site wiring and load. | 4.6 μs, and the response time is consistent every time |
| Traditional Soft PLC (software scheduling) | The operating system core performs task scheduling before executing the logic. | General control situations with loose timing accuracy requirements | Affected by system load, uncertain delay jitter will occur | 4000 μs, about 870 times that of M PLC |
The signal does not go through the core scheduling of the operating system and adopts a pure hardware logic architecture. After the signal is triggered, it directly drives the hardware circuit to execute the logic, achieving instantaneous response at the physical level.
Traditional Soft PLCs suffer from uncertain delays depending on the system load. M PLC ensures the absolute consistency of each response time and achieves true "deterministic control".
The response time of 4.6 microseconds is not only a leader in technical indicators, but also provides a greater margin for precision machinery, directly improving the maximum output per unit time.
Triggered by an external pulse signal and measured with a high-precision oscilloscope. The actual measured result is 4.6 microseconds, which is about 870 times faster than the traditional Soft PLC’s 4000 microseconds. This set of data comes from oscilloscope waveform capture and is a hardware-level measurement value.
able. The labeling offset is proportional to the controller's response delay. Taking a 100m/min production line as an example, the 4ms delay of Soft PLC will cause an offset of about 6.7mm, while the 4.6μs delay of M PLC will only cause an error of about 0.007mm.
Look at the timing accuracy requirements. If the production line involves high-speed triggering, labeling, flying shearing and other actions that are sensitive to microsecond timing, you should choose M PLC; if it is just general sequence control and the timing requirements are loose, Soft PLC will do.
Won't. The signals of M PLC do not go through the core scheduling of the operating system. It uses a pure hardware logic architecture to directly drive the hardware circuit, so it is not affected by the system load. This is exactly why it eliminates software jitter and achieves "deterministic control."
In high-speed automated production lines, the "reflex arc" of the controller determines the accuracy of the actuator.
We completely break the traditional bottleneck and provide "zero-latency" hardware support.
FATEK M PLC is a programmable logic controller using hardware direct-drive I/O architecture. It uses pure hardware logic to perform interrupt response without going through the operating system core scheduling. Its interrupt response time after being triggered by an external pulse signal is 4.6 microseconds, which is about 870 times faster than the 4000 microseconds of traditional Soft PLC, and ensures the consistency of each response time.
"Test conclusion: M PLC's interrupt response speed is about 870 times faster than the traditional solution."
| technology type | core competencies | Applicable scenarios (Best For) | Limitations | Interrupt response performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATEK M PLC (hardware direct drive I/O) | The signal is not dispatched by the operating system core and directly drives the hardware circuit using a pure hardware logic architecture. | High-speed automated production lines, labeling and other precision machinery that require strict timing accuracy | It needs to be triggered by an external pulse signal; the data on this page are actual measured values with a high-precision oscilloscope. The actual performance varies depending on the on-site wiring and load. | 4.6 μs, and the response time is consistent every time |
| Traditional Soft PLC (software scheduling) | The operating system core performs task scheduling before executing the logic. | General control situations with loose timing accuracy requirements | Affected by system load, uncertain delay jitter will occur | 4000 μs, about 870 times that of M PLC |
The signal does not go through the core scheduling of the operating system and adopts a pure hardware logic architecture. After the signal is triggered, it directly drives the hardware circuit to execute the logic, achieving instantaneous response at the physical level.
Traditional Soft PLCs suffer from uncertain delays depending on the system load. M PLC ensures the absolute consistency of each response time and achieves true "deterministic control".
The response time of 4.6 microseconds is not only a leader in technical indicators, but also provides a greater margin for precision machinery, directly improving the maximum output per unit time.
Triggered by an external pulse signal and measured with a high-precision oscilloscope. The actual measured result is 4.6 microseconds, which is about 870 times faster than the traditional Soft PLC’s 4000 microseconds. This set of data comes from oscilloscope waveform capture and is a hardware-level measurement value.
able. The labeling offset is proportional to the controller's response delay. Taking a 100m/min production line as an example, the 4ms delay of Soft PLC will cause an offset of about 6.7mm, while the 4.6μs delay of M PLC will only cause an error of about 0.007mm.
Look at the timing accuracy requirements. If the production line involves high-speed triggering, labeling, flying shearing and other actions that are sensitive to microsecond timing, you should choose M PLC; if it is just general sequence control and the timing requirements are loose, Soft PLC will do.
Won't. The signals of M PLC do not go through the core scheduling of the operating system. It uses a pure hardware logic architecture to directly drive the hardware circuit, so it is not affected by the system load. This is exactly why it eliminates software jitter and achieves "deterministic control."